PDP Logjam Continues As Court Recognises Sheriff
Justice Okon Abang of a Federal High
Court in Abuja on Thursday declared as illegal the Ahmed Makarfi-led
Caretaker Committee of the national leadership of the Peoples Democratic
Party.
The judge made the declaration in his
ruling after entertaining arguments from separate lawyers from the
Makarfi and the Ali Modu Sheriff-led factions of the party, who were
jostling for the right to represent the PDP in a pending suit instituted
by the Sheriff faction.
The judge ruled that the Makarfi-faction
was illegal because it was a product of the party’s convention which
held on May 21 in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, in defiance of an earlier
order of Justice Ibrahim Buba of the Lagos Division of the Federal High
Court, which had stopped the said convention from holding.
But the Makarfi caretaker committee
described the ruling of Justice Abang as objectionable, questionable and
very strange in the history of Nigeria judiciary.
The party, in a statement by its
spokesman, Mr. Dayo Adeyeye, on Thursday, declared that what Justice
Abang did was to sit on an appeal over a court of competent and
coordinate jurisdiction.
Adeyeye added that the party’s national convention, slated for August 17 in Port Harcourt, would go ahead as scheduled.
Justice Abang had slated Thursday
(yesterday) for the hearing of an application filed by the Sheriff-led
camp, seeking an interlocutory injunction to stop the Makarfi faction
from going ahead with its plan to conduct the party’s national
convention on August 17.
Two lawyers – Ferdinand Obi (SAN),
representing the Makarfi camp, and Mr. Olagoke Fakunle (SAN), who
represented Sheriff faction of the PDP – announced their appearance for
the party on Thursday.
Counsel for the plaintiffs (Sheriff
camp), Chief Niyi Akintola (SAN), urged the court to first determine the
right lawyer to represent the PDP.
In response, Justice Abang posed
questions, which he said the Makarfi-led faction should answer to enable
the court to determine whose appearance was legal.
Obi tendered the judgment of Justice A.
M. Liman of the Port Harcourt Division in suit No. FHC/PH/CS/524/2016,
which he said, settled issue and had ruled in Makarfi faction’s favour.
But in his ruling, Justice Abang
referred to the Justice Buba’s May 12 order from Lagos, restraining the
PDP from conducting any election into the offices of its National
Chairman, National Secretary and National Auditor, occupied by Sheriff
an others.
According to the court, “Ali Modu
Sheriff is the National Chairman of the PDP. Any decision not taken by
the Sheriff-led committee is not binding on the PDP.”
He therefore affirmed Fakunle as the authentic lawyer for the PDP.
The judge ruled, “That order is still
subsisting and has not been vacated. Yet again, on May 20, the court
made another order, directing INEC and the PDP to maintain the status
quo on issue relating to the position of the plaintiffs pending the
determination of the suit before it.
“Later in the same month, the PDP held a
convention that removed these plaintiffs and set up a Caretaker
Committee that led to the emergence of Makarfi, who briefed you (Obi) to
appear in this matter.
“The question is, does the Port Harcourt
Division have jurisdiction to entertain proceedings that led to various
orders made by it and the judgment delivered on July 4, which
neutralised the potency of the previous order by the Lagos Division,
with the judges having coordinate jurisdiction?
“That was notwithstanding the fact that under Section 249 of the constitution, the Federal High Court is one.
“This is having regard to established
principle of law that where an order, which ought to have been made, is
made in error, a court of coordinate jurisdiction has the power to set
it aside.”
He said on the basis of the order made
by the court in the Lagos Division, Makarfi could not legally hold the
office he was laying claim to.
He ruled that Sheriff was the leader of the party recognised by subsisting court order.
The judge ruled, “Parties have an
uncompromising duty to obey a court order until it is set aside. The
Lagos Division made orders on May 12 and 20, forbidding the PDP from
removing the Sheriff-led caretaker committee. That order is still
subsisting.
“Having regard to the order of the
court, the PDP had no lawful authority to hold the convention that led
to the emergence of the Makarfi-led committee.
“The convention was unlawfully held and
the caretaker committee was unlawfully and illegally appointed and could
not take any legal decision for the PDP in view of the subsisting order
of the Lagos Division of this court.
“Consequently, any action taken by the
Makarfi-led committee, including the purported mandate for legal
representation in this matter, is hereby declared illegal.
“If the Makarfi-led Caretaker Committee,
as apostles of impunity, missed their way to the Port Harcourt Division
of this court, that court could not have conveniently assumed
jurisdiction to set aside the earlier decision of the Lagos Division.
“I hold that the Port Harcourt Division
of this court cannot make an order to neutralise the potency of the
Lagos Division of this court dated May 12 and 20.”
The judge said he would have voided the
judgment of the Port Harcourt Division for being a nullity, assuming
there was an application to that effect.
He warned politicians not to cause
disaffection among judges of the High Court, saying, “The culture of
impunity must stop in this country.”
Justice Okon Abang did not make a
specific pronouncement on the planned national convention slated by the
Makarfi camp for August 17.
Justice Abang, who adjourned to August
15 for a ruling on an application by members of the Makarfi-led
committee to be made a party in the suit, drew parties attention to the
doctrine of lis pendens (a notice of the pendency of a suit in
respect of an issue) and warned them against the consequences of taking
steps that could affect the subject of the suit before his court.
“It will be in the interest of the
plaintiff, defendants and parties, seeking to be joined not to take
steps that will affect the claims of the plaintiffs in this suit in line
with the principle of lis pendens.” the judge said.
But the statement by Adeyeye on behalf
of the Makarfi-led caretaker committee added, “The judgment of the
Federal High Court in Port Harcourt was very clear that the National
Caretaker Committee was duly constituted and recognised; and in line
with that, the scheduled National Convention for August 17, 2016 still
holds.
“We have just received information that
Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court in Abuja has granted an
Order of Interlocutory Injunction stopping our scheduled National
Convention in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, but we want to state that the
judgment of July 4, 2016, supersedes any exparte order or interlocutory
injunctions. So, our National Convention will hold as scheduled in Port
Harcourt, Rivers State.
“Let Nigerians recall the two former
judgments before the Port Harcourt judgment declared that Senator
Sheriff is not qualified to be a National Chairman given that the PDP
Constitution 2014, which he claimed brought him to power, is not in
existence and therefore, null and void.
“The PDP wants Nigerians to know that
Justice Okon Abang is deliberately engaging in acts of derailing the
country’s democracy given the fact that his court is not an Appeal Court
that can set aside any judgment.”
He added that being law-abiding, the caretaker committee would apply for a stay of execution of the order and also appeal it.
The substantive suit was filed by
Sheriff and eight others who said they filed the suit numbered
FHC/ABJ/CS/464/2016 for themselves and on behalf of the Executive
Committee/National Working Committee of the PDP.
They are Sheriff as National Chairman;
Prof. Wale Oladipo (National Secretary); Dennis Alonge-Niyi (Deputy
National Youth Leader); Alhaji Bashir Maidugu (Deputy National Legal
Adviser); Mrs. Hanatu Ulam (Deputy National Women Leader); Alhaji Lawa
Anchi (Deputy National Auditor); Chief Okey Nnadozie (Deputy National
Organising Secretary), and Chief Olisa Metuh (National Publicity
Secretary).
The suit has only the Independent National Electoral Commission and the PDP as defendants.
The plaintiffs had filed the substantive
suit on July 4, 2016, contending that that by virtue of the PDP’s
constitution, they must remain in office till 2018.



No comments